Hey there, digital navigators! Ever feel like those online ads for sneakers are following you around like a lost puppy? Well, that's because companies track your online moves through cookies. But what happens when tracking meets privacy head-on in the courtroom?
Cue the intriguing case of Shah v. Fandom, Inc., where the plaintiffs aren't too thrilled about their online activities being tracked without a clear "yes" from them. They're challenging gamespot.com under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA)—a law that's been around since before the internet was a twinkle in technology's eye.
While CIPA was originally all about keeping eavesdroppers off your phone calls, the plaintiffs in Shah v. Fandom, Inc. are pushing to see if the same privacy rules should protect our clicks and scrolls. It's a legal plot twist where old-world laws crash into new-world tech.
This legal tussle is unfolding against the backdrop of California's privacy vanguard, the CCPA and the CPRA, which are like privacy shields for consumers, giving you the power to tell companies to take a hike when they want to sell your data.
The Shah v. Fandom, Inc. case could be a game-changer for what online consent really means. It's a must-watch for anyone who's ever wondered where their digital data is jetting off to without their permission.
©2024 East West General Counsel. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between East West General Counsel and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of East West General Counsel.
Comments